LGBTQIA+ Communities and History: Difference between revisions

From Chew Inclusive Terminology Glossary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 961: Line 961:
Green's  Dictionary of Slang - [https://greensdictofslang.com/]
Green's  Dictionary of Slang - [https://greensdictofslang.com/]
|-
|-
|'''mlmmsm'''
|'''mlm'''
 
'''msm'''
|Abbreviations  for "men who love men," and "men who have sex with men."  This term emphasizes the behavior, rather than the identities of the  individuals involved. Not widely used in the UK - "queer men,"  "gay men, or "LGBTQ+ men" are often preferred, unless  specifically talking about sexual behaviour, eg in a medical context.
|Abbreviations  for "men who love men," and "men who have sex with men."  This term emphasizes the behavior, rather than the identities of the  individuals involved. Not widely used in the UK - "queer men,"  "gay men, or "LGBTQ+ men" are often preferred, unless  specifically talking about sexual behaviour, eg in a medical context.
|
|
Line 1,446: Line 1,448:
Rictor Norton (Ed.),  "Homosexual Terms in 18th-century Dictionaries", Homosexuality in  Eighteenth-Century England: A Sourcebook, 2021  [http://www.rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/diction.htm]
Rictor Norton (Ed.),  "Homosexual Terms in 18th-century Dictionaries", Homosexuality in  Eighteenth-Century England: A Sourcebook, 2021  [http://www.rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/diction.htm]
|-
|-
|'''wlwwsw'''
|'''wlw'''
 
'''wsw'''
|Abbreviations  for "women who love women," and "women who have sex with  women." This term emphasizes the behavior, rather than the identities of  the individuals involved. Not widely used in the UK - "queer  women," "lesbians," or "LGBTQ+ women" are often  preferred, unless specifically talking about sexual behaviour, eg in a  medical context.
|Abbreviations  for "women who love women," and "women who have sex with  women." This term emphasizes the behavior, rather than the identities of  the individuals involved. Not widely used in the UK - "queer  women," "lesbians," or "LGBTQ+ women" are often  preferred, unless specifically talking about sexual behaviour, eg in a  medical context.
|
|
|"LGBTQ+  Terminology," Montclair State University [https://www.montclair.edu/lgbtq-center/lgbtq-resources/terminology/]
|"LGBTQ+  Terminology," Montclair State University [https://www.montclair.edu/lgbtq-center/lgbtq-resources/terminology/]
|}
|}

Revision as of 14:05, 18 December 2023


Please see the Guidance for writing about LGBTQ+ people in UK cultural heritage for general guidance.

The LGBTQIA+ section has been separated into three subsections in order to make it easier to use. However, it is important to recognise that these divisions are often arbitrary. Some words that were slurs have been reclaimed by LGBTQIA+ communities, and then moved into general usage (such as "queer"). Some words that were once in general usage with (arguably) neutral connotations are now outdated or even offensive.

There is an argument that taxonomising LGBTQIA+ people in this way is always pathologising and reductive; on the other hand, not developing classifications for language can reduce confidence in deploying LGBTQIA+ terminology at all, which risks perpetuating archival silences. These categories should be in ongoing development, and discussion/editing of these divisions is invited.